Atlassian uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, perform analytics and research, and conduct advertising. Accept all cookies to indicate that you agree to our use of cookies on your device. Atlassian cookies and tracking notice, (opens new window)
Welcome to the PHUSE Advance Hub

WORKING GROUPS
Results will update as you type.
  • Working Groups
    • Data Transparency
    • Data Visualisation & Open Source Technology
    • Emerging Trends & Innovation
    • Nonclinical Topics
    • Optimizing the Use of Data Standards
    • pharmaverse
    • Real World Evidence
    • Risk Based Quality Management
      • End to End RBQM Education
      • Enhanced Risk-based Quality Management (RBQM) Approaches for First-in-Human and/or Small Clinical Trials
      • Enhancing the Clinical Trial Risk Assessment Process
      • OpenRBQM: Pre-Competitive Collaboration on Open-Source Software for RBQM
      • Quality Tolerance Limits – Threshold Setting Methodologies
    • Safety Analytics
  • Hot Topics
  • Useful Information
  • Deliverables
  • Working Groups Events
  • Working Groups Report – Q3 2025
  • Working Groups Archive
  • Working Groups Events Archive

    You‘re viewing this with anonymous access, so some content might be blocked.
    /
    Enhancing the Clinical Trial Risk Assessment Process
    Updated Oct 01

      Enhancing the Clinical Trial Risk Assessment Process

      Project Scope 

      We propose beginning this project by identifying CtQ factors via a risk assessment process (characterising risk including assessment and mitigation/risk reduction strategies), which would include identifying trial-level QTLs that support CtQ factors. 

      Problem Statement

      Problem Statement

      Conducting a risk assessment for a clinical trial (a pre-competitive set of activities) can be time-intensive and may not be consistently focused on relevant critical to quality (CtQ) risks. Defining and recommending enhanced approaches and best practices may help increase the effectiveness and efficiency of this critical activity. Refining the risk assessment process (to include identifying CtQs and how they align with intercurrent events/estimands (ICEs) and the application of quality tolerance limits (QTLs)) can help ensure the scientific question is answered and the data collected is reliable and interpretable for the planned analysis. 

      Problem Impact

      Problem Impact

      Increased stakeholder support and participation. More meaningful risk assessments. Ability to re-use information collected in processes downstream from risk assessment, to enhance effectiveness and efficiency. 

      Project Leads

      Email

      Kristin Stallcup, Takeda

      Kristin.Stallcup@takeda.com  

      Rachael Geedey, CluePoints

      Rachael.Geedey@cluepoints.com

      Alex Pearce, PHUSE Project Assistant

      alexandra@phuse.global

      Current Status (Updated Quarterly) 

      • Paper being drafted​

      • Webinar planning with CluePoints​​

      • Determine if two papers are needed due to length

      • Prepare for October webinar

       

       

       

      Objectives & Deliverables

      Timelines

      Kick off and team formation

      Complete

      Align on project parameters and complete initial within-workstream survey

      Complete

      • Discuss in more detail specific components of the project: 

        • Challenges surfaced from initial survey

        • Best Practices

        • Incorporating success stories to illustrate key points. 

      Q1-Q2 2025

      Draft White Paper

      Q2-Q3 2025

      Finalise and Review the White Paper

      Q4 2025

      Define and Strategise the Second Wave of the Sub-Team Work

      Q4 2025

       

       

       

       

      {"serverDuration": 20, "requestCorrelationId": "2a4ee518af1640b69af32f254ccbd6fd"}