...
Clinical Visual Analytics for Review and Submission (CVARS) – Started Q1 2022 | |
---|---|
Project Scope: Development of an open-source tool and package to enable generation of identified interactive plots for clinical review and direct inclusion in submissions to regulatory agencies. The initial scope is to develop a package to generate interactive forest and volcano plots for adverse events and FDA Medical Queries (FMQs) analysis outputs for inclusion in submissions to the FDA. This work is a collaboration among the American Statistical Association (ASA), PHUSE and the FDA. | Current Status:
Regular Project Meeting Day/Time: Key Skills: (currently being reviewed by WG Leads)
|
Communication of Version Metadata for Open-Source Languages – Started Q
Project Scope:
This project aims to develop a new template or enhance an existing one such as the Study Data Standardisation Plan (SDSP) or Analysis Data Reviewer’s Guide (ADRG), to ensure that metadata pertaining to the versions of statistical packages and procedures is consistently documented in alignment with health authority expectations. This standardised template will streamline the submission of clinical study metadata to health authorities as part of the regulatory review process.
Current Status:
Continue FDA Engagement
Finalise Metadata Approach
Onboard New Team Members
Develop Project Plan
Regular Project Meeting Day/Time:
Bi-weekly: Wednesdays 19:00-20:00 GMT
Key Skills: (currently being reviewed by WG Leads)
Experience in statistical programming language
Experience in processing metadata
Comparing Analysis Method Implementations in Software (CAMIS) – Started Q Q1 2022 | |
---|---|
Project Scope: Comparing Analysis Method Implementations in Software (CAMIS) has evolved from the Clinical Statistical Reporting in a Multilingual World project. Several discrepancies have been discovered in statistical analysis results between different programming languages, even in fully qualified statistical computing environments. Subtle differences exist between the fundamental approaches implemented by each language, yielding differences in results which are each correct in their own right. The fact that these differences exist causes unease on the behalf of sponsor companies when submitting to a regulatory agency, as it is uncertain if the agency will view these differences as problematic. Understanding the agency’s expectations will contribute significantly to enabling the broader adoption of multiple programming languages in the production of data submission packages for regulatory review The CAMIS project seeks to clearly define this problem and provide a framework for assessing the fundamental differences for a particular statistical analysis across languages. In this context, the risk of interpreting numerical differences in analysis results due solely to differences in programming language can be mitigated, instilling confidence in both the sponsor company and the agency during the review period. This will be accomplished by:
The CAMIS repository to document known differences is now live and open for community contributions. | Current Status:
Regular Project Meeting Day/Time:
Key Skills: (currently being reviewed by WG Leads)
|
...